Succession certificate: which of the assets actually need one
A succession certificate is a court document the family should need for very few assets: none where a nominee was registered, none for small balances at a bank or in securities, and never for a flat
Summary
A succession certificate is a court document the family should need for very few assets: none where a nominee was registered, none for small balances at a bank or in securities, and never for a flat or a plot, which section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 keeps outside it altogether. The question is decided asset by asset, on four facts: the kind of asset, the institution, whether there was a nominee, and the value against that institution's threshold.
The situation
After a death the heirs sit with a folder of passbooks, fund statements, a demat account, a PF number and a flat agreement, and at least one counter says "bring a succession certificate". That means a civil court petition, a court fee that in many states runs to a few per cent of the value, and months of waiting. For many of the assets in that folder the law does not require it, and in 2026 two of the rules that counters are working from changed.
The rule
Every asset lands on one of three routes. Nominee or survivor: claim form, death certificate, KYC. Simplified (no nominee, value within the threshold): a claim with an indemnity bond and a no-objection or legal-heir document. Court document (no nominee, above the threshold): succession certificate, probate, letters of administration or a decree, or in some cases an alternative the regulator now allows.
| Asset | Rule | No-nominee threshold for the simplified route |
|---|---|---|
| Bank deposits and lockers | RBI (Settlement of Claims in respect of Deceased Customers of Banks) Directions, 2025, 26 Sep 2025 | ₹15 lakh commercial banks; ₹5 lakh co-operative banks (a bank may fix higher) |
| Shares and mutual fund units | SEBI circular of 23 Jul 2026, effective 22 Aug 2026 | ₹10 lakh per company or folio (physical); ₹30 lakh per demat account |
| EPF, EPS, EDLI | EPF Scheme, 1952 | No rupee threshold; paid to "family" under the Scheme |
| Life insurance | Insurance Act, 1938, s.39 | No regulator threshold; each insurer sets its own |
| Post office schemes | Government Savings Promotion General Rules, 2018 | ₹5 lakh |
| Flat, house, plot | Indian Succession Act, 1925, s.370 | Not applicable: no succession certificate is granted for immovable property |
Securities have a fast lane. Under SEBI's circular, a holding up to ₹10,000 (physical) or ₹30,000 (demat) goes through Quick Transmission Processing on a plain-paper form with relationship proof and a verifiable death certificate, but only for "immediate relatives of the deceased security holder(s) viz. parents, spouse, children and parents-in-law". Above ₹30 lakh in demat, the claimant can give a Legal Heirship Certificate with a notarised indemnity bond instead of a court document, with a notarised affidavit-cum-NOC from all legal heirs. Transmission is to be completed within 21 calendar days of complete documents.
Banks have a clock too. Deposit claims are to be settled within 15 calendar days of complete documents, with compensation for delay.
Probate is no longer compulsory anywhere. Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, which made probate a precondition for acting on certain Wills in the old presidency towns of Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata, was omitted by the Repealing and Amending Act, 2025, in force from 21 December 2025. SEBI's circular removes mandatory probate for securities in line with it.
Where people go wrong
Asking for a succession certificate for the flat. Section 370 limits a succession certificate to debts and securities. A court will not grant one for immovable property, and a registrar cannot mutate on one. With a Will, mutation proceeds on the Will, the death certificate and the co-heirs' affidavits; without one, on a legal heir or survivorship certificate from the revenue authority. Where one heir is to take the whole, the others need a registered release deed; a no-objection letter on plain paper does not pass title.
Treating the housing society nominee as the owner. The society must transfer membership to the registered nominee without a court order (Indrani Wahi v. Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Supreme Court, 2016). The nominee holds it for the legal heirs; membership is not title.
Reading "parents-in-law" the wrong way round. SEBI's fast lane covers the deceased's parents-in-law, the parents of the deceased's spouse. It does not cover a daughter-in-law or son-in-law; their claim goes by the ordinary simplified route.
Assuming a nominee on a life policy always keeps the money. Under section 39(7) of the Insurance Act, a nominee who is a parent, spouse or child is beneficially entitled. Any other nominee (a brother, a friend) receives the money as trustee for the legal heirs.
Splitting EPF equally among all the heirs. Without a nomination, EPF is paid to the "family" as the Scheme defines it, and paragraph 70(ii) excludes a major son and a married daughter whose husband is alive where a widow, a minor child or a dependent parent survives. It is not succession law, and no certificate is needed unless there is no family at all.
Relying on the probate repeal for an old death. The omission saves proceedings already pending. Whether a Will of someone who died before 21 December 2025, with nothing filed, can now be acted on without probate is not settled in published commentary. Take advice before relying on it.
What to do
- List each asset separately with its institution, its value on the date of death and whether a nominee or survivor was registered.
- Put each one on its route from the table, using the institution's own threshold and asking the bank or insurer for its figure in writing if it is higher.
- For every no-nominee asset within the threshold, prepare the indemnity bond on stamp paper and the no-objection or affidavit-cum-NOC from the other heirs once, and reuse the set.
- Keep the court petition for what is left above every threshold, and never file one for immovable property.
- Where a counter still insists on a document the rule does not require, ask for the refusal in writing with the rule it relies on.
The tool
I built a checker for this because I kept answering the same question for grieving families one asset at a time, from five regulators' papers. You describe one asset in five answers (the kind of asset, the kind of institution, whether there was a nominee, whether there is a Will, and your relationship to the deceased), add the value, and it tells you which route applies, what to collect, and why a counter may still ask for more; it drafts the indemnity bond, the no-objection affidavit and a covering letter with your details, and each verdict card prints on its own page to carry to the counter. It does not work out who inherits what share, it has no religion-specific succession rules, no state stamp-duty or court-fee rates, and it files nothing. Nothing you type leaves your browser.
Open the succession checker page
Sources
- Indian Succession Act, 1925 — section 370 — https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1494917/
- RBI — Settlement of Claims in respect of Deceased Customers of Banks Directions, 2025 (26 September 2025), via TaxGuru — https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-standardizes-deceased-customer-claim-settlement-banks.html
- SEBI circular HO/38/13/11(14)2026-MIRSD-POD/I/17111/2026, 23 July 2026, via TaxGuru — https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-simplifies-securities-transmission-framework-qtp.html
- Insurance Act, 1938 — section 39 — https://indiankanoon.org/doc/610691/
- Indrani Wahi v. Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Supreme Court, 10 March 2016) — https://indiankanoon.org/doc/13253533/
- Khaitan & Co — Probate no longer mandatory: the Repealing and Amending Act, 2025 — https://www.khaitanco.com/thought-leadership/Probate-no-longer-mandatory-Impact-of-the-Repealing-and-Amending-Act-2025-on-Testamentary-Succession
- Mondaq — Repeal of section 213: implications and concerns (6 January 2026) — https://www.mondaq.com/india/wills-intestacy-estate-planning/1727480/repeal-of-section-213-of-the-indian-succession-act-1925-implications-and-concerns